Imagine you are with family, friends and acquaintances

Now, imagine that a lunatic happens upon your gathering with a gun and starts shooting into the crowd. Some of the shooting seemed directed at people personally while others were sprayed at random

Everyone is of course frightened shocked and horrified, ducking for cover and doing anything they can to get away. Many people at the party are armed as well, and while this madman walks around, people with the presence of mind reach for their weapons and keep on firing until the gunmen is brought down. People continue to fire at him as he falls, making sure that he wont make any attempts to squeeze another shot off and take any more life. Would you say that these people acted immorally in ending the gunman’s life or did they act properly?

I couldn’t believe this piece I read in Ynet by Micky Levy(well, actually, I could) saying that the policeman who killed the terrorist by putting 3 bullets in his head had acted immorally. Another woman had shot the terrorist initially stopping him for a while when, according to the article, someone threw a rock on the bulldozer which roused to madman and he started down the road again to do G-d knows what else. The policeman in question had the presence of mind to jump on the bulldozer and put an end to whatever else could have happened for once and for all. Why the onus is being put on the heroes of the day instead of the terrorist is beyond me. The guy was shot..he could have simply given up, but no, he pulled himself up after killing 3 people and injuring almost 70. Who knew what else he could do? People like this make me sick. Blaming those that put an end to violence. Ridiculous

It’s a good thing lefty pundits arent running the government. The goverment there is bad enough without garbage like this in print. Put the blame where it belongs. If you hijack a bulldozer and kill and terrorize people, it might end with a bullet in your head. And you’ll deserve it if you don’t give yourself up.

Write a comment